Controversial, because it involves ethics, government intervention, and justice all of which are emotionally vibrant areas of societal experience.
Welfare involves ethics because some minds contend that government should provide support for those who are at a certain level of need it is right and ethical for government to be proactive and assist those in need of assistance, rather than allowing them to suffer, by comparison.
Welfare involves government intervention because there is a line where proactive, perhaps ethical government support changes into intervention. Welfare as the support appears as a safety net a foundation for those in certain defined financial circumstances.
Welfare as intervention appears as a mobile and active safety net that wraps people up according to its own will and even when these people are not showing the characteristics that would typically or ‘reasonably’ require the welfare safety net.
Welfare involves justice because some minds contend that the needy should not receive support or assistance, rather all people should left live out their lives earning returns only on that which they invest tasting the earned delicacies or the salt of sweat, not nourishing themselves with a free lunch.
Two issues in welfare’s involvement with justice are – (1) it can seem unjust that some are earning their bread and others are being given their bread despite the apparent or reasonable necessity of such action, and (2) it can seem unjust to provide support and assistance because to an extent, this can dim the flame of desire and ambition to create self-sufficiency.
Welfare involves ethics, government intervention, and justice, and for these reasons, welfare can be a controversial subject. We have briefly over-viewed the depth of controversy and significance of welfare, touching on it simply.
Government Support or Government Control
In a word, we are looking into the possibility of government extending welfare programs and increasing government support on a global scale.
The question is of how welfare could be used to seize the freedoms of the people in the name of supporting the collective to what extent could welfare be used as a weapon to help the masses into hegemony?The second part of this question pertains to the controversy of justice and welfare. We are asking – to what extent could welfare lower the ambitions and aspirations of the people and henceforth, develop government-dependency.
The question as a whole concerns the role of welfare programs nationally through government, and supra-nationally through global organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (loans) and the United Nations in developing financial globalization, global collectivism (vast government rule over the collective), and a breach in the bellies of ambition for financial self-sufficiency.
We are asking – to what extent expanding government and extending welfare programs can contribute to the evolution of government feeding the ducks, to force-feeding the ducks, to savoring the melty foie gras, sliding around the government tongue, swimming around the government mouth, and providing further energy to fuel the growing government machine.
For our purposes, the main course feeding the Global Welfare Crisis is not the typical government income-support, food discounts, or healthcare support, for example the main course, is the loan.Ask yourself this question – could the loan be a form of bait?Could it be that allowing easy loans is part of a plan to fatten you up – for a feast?
The great duck dinner.
Roth E. Barrons is welcoming you to http://www.TheGlobalFCzone.com Providing the powerful tools you need right now to educate, prepare, and profit during global financial crisis. Subscribe to the Crisis to Profit Newsletter for free and simple videos and articles related The GFC
Why should the government give money to the poor when multinational corporations need it so badly?! Watch a higher quality version and see more propaganda at www.companystate.com
